Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The International Journal of Robotics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miura, H.
Right arrow Articles by Shimoyama, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Dynamic Walk of a Biped

Hirofumi Miura

Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113 Japan

Isao Shimoyama

Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113 Japan

The authors have developed five kinds of biped locomotive robots so far. They are named BIPER-1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. All of them are statically unstable but can perform a dynamically stable walk with suitable control. BIPER-1 and BIPER-2 walk only sideways. BIPER-3 is a stilt-type robot whose foot contacts occur at a point and who can walk sideways, back ward, and forward. BIPER-4's legs have the same degrees of freedom as human legs. BIPER-5 is similar to BIPER-3, but in the case of BIPER-5 all apparatus, such as the computer, are mounted on it.

This paper deals with the control theory used for BIPER-3 and BIPER-4. In both cases, basically the same control method is applied. The most important point is that the mo tion of either robot during the single-leg support phase can be approximated by the motion of an inverted pendulum. Ac cordingly, in this paper, dynamic walk is considered to be a series of inverted-pendulum motions with appropriate condi tions of connection.

The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 60-74 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/027836498400300206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
K. Ono, T. Furuichi, and R. Takahashi
Self-Excited Walking of a Biped Mechanism with Feet
The International Journal of Robotics Research, January 1, 2004; 23(1): 55 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
Y. Fukuoka, H. Kimura, and A. H. Cohen
Adaptive Dynamic Walking of a Quadruped Robot on Irregular Terrain Based on Biological Concepts
The International Journal of Robotics Research, March 1, 2003; 22(3-4): 187 - 202.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
K. Ono, R. Takahashi, and T. Shimada
Self-Excited Walking of a Biped Mechanism
The International Journal of Robotics Research, December 1, 2001; 20(12): 953 - 966.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The International Journal of Robotics ResearchHome page
J. Pratt, C.-M. Chew, A. Torres, P. Dilworth, and G. Pratt
Virtual Model Control: An Intuitive Approach for Bipedal Locomotion
The International Journal of Robotics Research, February 1, 2001; 20(2): 129 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Adaptive BehaviorHome page
K. S. Espenschied, H. J. Chiel, R. D. Quinn, and R. D. Beer
Leg Coordination Mechanisms in the Stick Insect Applied to Hexapod Robot Locomotion
Adaptive Behavior, March 1, 1993; 1(4): 455 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]