Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The International Journal of Robotics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Multimedia
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0278364909343970v1
28/11-12/1507    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haddadin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hirzinger, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Requirements for Safe Robots: Measurements, Analysis and New Insights

Sami Haddadin

Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, DLR-German Aerospace Center, P.O. Box 1116, D-82230 Wessling, Germany, sami.haddadin{at}dlr.de

Alin Albu-Schäffer

Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, DLR-German Aerospace Center, P.O. Box 1116, D-82230 Wessling, Germany, alin.albu-schaeffer{at}dlr.de

Gerd Hirzinger

Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, DLR-German Aerospace Center, P.O. Box 1116, D-82230 Wessling, Germany, gerd.hirzinger{at}dlr.de

Physical human—robot interaction and cooperation has become a topic of increasing importance and of major focus in robotics research. An essential requirement of a robot designed for high mobility and direct interaction with human users or uncertain environments is that it must in no case pose a threat to the human. Until recently, quite a few attempts were made to investigate real-world threats via collision tests and use the outcome to considerably improve safety during physical human—robot interaction. In this paper, we give an overview of our systematic evaluation of safety in human—robot interaction, covering various aspects of the most significant injury mechanisms. In order to quantify the potential injury risk emanating from such a manipulator, impact tests with the DLR-Lightweight Robot III were carried out using standard automobile crash test facilities at the German Automobile Club (ADAC). Based on these tests, several industrial robots of different weight have been evaluated and the influence of the robot mass and velocity have been investigated. The evaluated non-constrained impacts would only partially capture the nature of human—robot safety. A possibly constrained environment and its effect on the resulting human injuries are discussed and evaluated from different perspectives. As well as such impact tests and simulations, we have analyzed the problem of the quasi-static constrained impact, which could pose a serious threat to the human even for low-inertia robots under certain circumstances. Finally, possible injuries relevant in robotics are summarized and systematically classified.

Key Words: Physical Human-Robot Interaction • Simulation • Flexible Arms • Mechanics • Design and Control • Force Control

This version was published on November 1, 2009

The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 28, No. 11-12, 1507-1527 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0278364909343970


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?