Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The International Journal of Robotics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hobbelen, D.G.E.
Right arrow Articles by Wisse, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ankle Actuation for Limit Cycle Walkers

D.G.E. Hobbelen

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands, d.g.e.hobbelen{at}tudelft.nl

M. Wisse

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands

Limit Cycle Walkers are bipeds that exhibit a stable cyclic gait without requiring local controllability at all times during gait. Well-known example are McGeer's "Passive Dynamic Walkers", but the concept expands to actuated bipeds as involved in this study. Current state-of-the-art Limit Cycle Walkers excel in being very energy efficient, but their ability to handle disturbances (i.e. disturbance rejection) is still limited. A way to improve this ability while maintaining low energy consumption is the use of ankle actuation, which has so far seen few applications in this type of walker. In this paper we study the effect of (1) applying (passive) stiffness in the ankle joint, (2) applying control in the stance ankle based only on local sensor information and (3) modulating ankle push-off. For all three strategies the paper shows how they influence energy use and disturbance rejection of a simple point mass walking model, a more realistic model and a physical prototype. We find that applying a passive ankle spring that results in premature heel rise is energetically optimal and gives an actuation pattern that largely resembles that of humans. Local stance ankle control and ankle push-off modulation can improve the disturbance rejection of a Limit Cycle Walker by at least 60%, without increasing its energy use. These findings are substantiated by showing that our prototype is able to handle large disturbances such as a step-down of 5% of its leg length, while walking efficiently at a mechanical cost of transport of 0.09.

Key Words: Limit cycle walkers • bipeds • dynamic walking • ankle actuation • ankle stiffness • ankle push-off • energy consumption • disturbance rejection

The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 27, No. 6, 709-735 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0278364908091365


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?