This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pressman, A. Articles by Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Perception of Delayed Stiffness

Sensory Motor Performance Program Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Chicago IL and Department of Biomedical Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel a-pressman{at}northwestern.edu

Leah J. Welty

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago IL lwelty{at}northwestern.edu

Amir Karniel

Department of Biomedical Engineering Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel akarniel{at}bgu.ac.il

Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi

Sensory Motor Performance Program Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Department of Physiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago IL sandro{at}northwestern.edu

Advanced technology has recently provided truly immersive virtual environments with teleoperated robotic devices. In order to control movements from a distance, the human sensorimotor system has to overcome the e fects of delay. Currently, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie haptic estimation in delayed environments. The aim of this research is to explore the e fect of a delay on perception of surfaces sti fness. A forced choice paradigm was used in which subjects were asked to identify the sti fer of two virtual spring-like surfaces based on manipulation without visual feedback. Virtual surfaces were obtained by generating an elastic force proportional to the penetration of the handle of a manipulandum inside a virtual boundary. The elastic force was either an instantaneous function of the displacement, delayed at 30 or 60 milliseconds after the displacement or led the displacement (by means of Kalman predictor) by 50 milliseconds. It was assumed that, to estimate sti fness, the brain relates the experienced interaction forces with the amount of penetration. The results of the experiment indicate a systematic dependence of the estimated sti fness upon the delay between position and force. When the force lagged the penetration, surfaces were perceived as sti fer. Conversely, when the force led the penetration, surfaces were perceived as softer. The perceptual findings were compared with different regression models. This allowed some candidate models to be discarded. To further refine the analysis, a second experiment was carried out in which the delay was introduced only during part of the hand/surface interaction, either while the hand was moving into the spring-like surface or when it was moving out of it. Findings are consistent with sti fness estimates based on dividing the maximum force by the perceived amount of penetration. Findings are not consistent with an estimate of compliance based on the maximum position or local sti fness on the way out nor with linear estimates of sti fness based on the entire force/motion history.

Key Words: Haptics and Haptic Interfaces • Telerobotics • Force and Tactile Sensing • Force Control • Contact Modelling • Virtual Reality and Interfaces

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?