This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saha, M. Articles by Sánchez-Ante, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Planning Tours of Robotic Arms among Partitioned Goals

Computer Science Department Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA mitul{at}cs.stanford.edu

Tim Roughgarden

Jean-Claude Latombe

Computer Science Department Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Gildardo Sánchez-Ante

Computer Science Department National University of Singapore, Singapore

In this paper we consider a motion planning problem that occurs in tasks such as spot welding, car painting, inspection, and measurement, where the end-effector of a robotic arm must reach successive goal placements given as inputs. The problem is to compute a nearoptimal path of the arm so that the end-effector visits each goal once. It combines two notoriously hard subproblems: the collisionfree shortest-path and the traveling-salesman problems. It is further complicated by the fact that each goal placement of the end-effector may be achieved by several configurations of the arm (distinct solutions of the arm's inverse kinematics). This leads to considering a set of goal configurations of the robot that are partitioned into groups. The planner must compute a robot path that visits one configuration in each group and is near optimal over all configurations in every goal group and over all group orderings. The algorithm described in this paper operates under the assumption that finding a good tour in a graph with edges of given costs takes much less time than computing good paths between all pairs of goal configurations from different groups. So, the algorithm balances the time spent in computing paths between goal configurations and the time spent in computing tours. Although the algorithm still computes a quadratic number of such paths in the worst case, experimental results show that it is much faster in practice.

Key Words: motion planning • multigoal planning • partitioned goal

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?