This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Apostolopoulos, D. S. Articles by Whittaker, W. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Technology and Field Demonstration of Robotic Search for Antarctic Meteorites

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvaniada1v{at}ri.cmu.edu

Michael D. Wagner

Benjamin N. Shamah

Liam Pedersen

Kimberly Shillcutt

William L. Whittaker

Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Meteorites are the only significant source of material from other planets and asteroids, and therefore are of immense scientific value. Antarctica’s frozen and pristine environment has proven to be the best place on earth to harvest meteorite specimens. The lack of melting and surface erosion keep meteorite falls visible on the ice surface in pristine condition for thousands of years. In this article, we describe the robotic technologies and field demonstration that enabled the first discovery of Antarctic meteorites by a robot. Using a novel autonomous control architecture, specialized science sensing, combined manipulation and visual servoing, and Bayesian classification, the Nomad robot found and classified five indigenous meteorites during an expedition to the remote site of Elephant Moraine in January 2000. This article first overviews Nomad’s mechatronic systems and details the control architecture that governs the robot’s autonomy and classifier that enables the autonomous interpretation of scientific data. It then focuses on the technical results achieved during field demonstrations at Elephant Moraine. Finally, the article discusses the benefits and limitations of robotic autonomy in science missions. Science autonomy is shown as a capable and expandable architecture for exploration and in situ classification. Inefficiencies in the existing implementation are explained with a focus on important lessons that outline future work.

Key Words: robotic meteorite search • science autonomy • Bayesian meteorite classifier

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?