Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The International Journal of Robotics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demey, S.
Right arrow Articles by De Schutter, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Model-Based Planar Contour Following in the Presence of Pose and Model Errors

Sabine Demey

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division PMA Celestijnenlaan 300B, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

Herman Bruyninckx

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division PMA Celestijnenlaan 300B, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

Joris De Schutter

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Department of Mechanical Engineering, Division PMA Celestijnenlaan 300B, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium

This article shows how the use of a geometric model during planar contour following with a force-controlled robot results in a higher quality (i.e., faster and/or more accurate) task execution, even in the presence of pose and model errors. Neither the pose (i.e., position and orientation) of the contour nor the starting point on the contour have to be known in advance.

The contour is described by curvature and/or orientation of the normal direction, as a function of arc length. The con tour is identified on-line from the sensor measurements, and matched on-line with its model. This yields an estimate of the point in the model that corresponds to the real contact point. The curvature from the model is then used to generate feed- forward velocity set points.

The article compares a nonrecursive deterministic least- squares matching strategy with recursive stochastic matching strategies, based on the extended Kalman filter and the Page- Hinkley hypothesis test. Matching is preferably based on cur vature profiles, since these are Euclidean invariant and hence reduce the search space of the matching. On contours with piecewise constant curvature, however, the extended Kalman- filter strategy uses the orientation of the normal direction. Extensive experimental evaluation of these strategies is given, including shape matching based on data during a deburring task.

1. The definition of this tangent frame is based on the Frenet frame; see Section 2.1.

2. Curvature, arc length, and orientation of the normal are defined in Section 2.1.

The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 16, No. 6, 840-858 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/027836499701600608


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?