Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The International Journal of Robotics Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cetinkunt, S.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, W.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Closed-Loop Behavior of a Feedback-Controlled Flexible Arm: A Comparative Study

Sabri Cetinkunt

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60680

Wen-Lung Yu

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60680

The dynamics of mechanical systems with distributed flexi bility are described by infinite-dimensional mathematical models. In order to design afinite-dimensional controller, a finite-dimensional model of the system is needed. The con trol problem of a flexible beam is a typical example. The general practice in obtaining a finite-dimensional model is to use modal approximation for distributed flexibility, retain a finite number of modes, and truncate the rest. In this approx imation, the appropriate selection of the mode shape func tions and the number of modes is not clearly known. Mostly standard pinned-free and clamped-free mode shapes are used for the flexible beam model, retaining only two or three modes and truncating the rest. The actual system, on the other hand, is infinite-dimensional, and the modes describing its flexible behavior under feedback control would be neither pinned-free nor clamped-free boundary condition modes. Rather, the mode shapes themselves are a function of the feedback control.

The infinite-dimensional transcendental transfer functions for a flexible beam are formulated without any modal ap proximation. Finite-dimensional transfer functions with different shapes and numbers of modes are formulated. The closed-loop performance predictions of different models under the same colocated and noncolocated controllers, which attempt to achieve high closed-loop bandwidth, are compared. Results are surprisingly consistent in all cases; the predictions of clamped-free mode shape models are much more accurate than the predictions of the pinned-free mode shape models.

The International Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, 263-275 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/027836499101000307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Vibration and ControlHome page
S. Kevorkian and M. Pascal
Distributed Control of Truss Structures
Journal of Vibration and Control, January 1, 2003; 9(1-2): 7 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]